Alex Novak
Audit / Build vs buy

Products went missing, and Adobe wasn't why: auditing a render farm before replacing it

A company wanted to replace an expensive render farm. The audit showed products were lost to five bugs in their own code, which any new tool would have inherited.

before
~$6.7k/month, queue waits up to 8.5 h, products going missing
after
a plan with ~$2.5k/month of quick savings and a replacement pilot
AWS Adobe Illustrator / Photoshop SQS Lambda

Context. An e-commerce company prints personalized merchandise. Every design is rendered on 21 Windows servers running old Adobe versions that can no longer be downloaded. That is ~$6.7k a month and up to 630k jobs. New products could wait 8.5 hours in the queue, and some never reached the store at all.

What I found. Five causes in the job runner, not in Adobe:

  1. A job leaves the queue before rendering, so a server crash loses it.
  2. Adobe errors are never caught or retried.
  3. A design counts as done as soon as one of its files exists.
  4. Nothing acts on the health-check status.
  5. A units bug means stuck jobs are never cleaned up.

Options. I compared five paths. Canva was out on its export cap: 5k a day against the 21k needed. Template SaaS tools cost more than the current servers. Adobe's cloud API only wins at a certain vendor price, and a custom Linux renderer needs a pilot.

Recommendation. Fix how the system runs before swapping the tool: stop losing jobs, a separate queue for new products, smaller servers. Then a pilot on ~10 templates with print-quality checks on 300 real jobs.

← All case studies

Get In Touch

Not sure your process is ready for automation?

Write me. The 20-minute starter call is free: I tell you whether this is an audit problem, and if it isn't, I say so.